Prejudice, is it the "inn" thing?

Every one has a history. It is your story: This is true even if it is a "lie." The story put out their by a rogue prosecutor to project herself into being the "pink Prick." Colluding with others to do the will of the elites. She put her name on perjured testimony. She corrupted the validity of the law. She used her position for fame and fortune. She knew that the witnesses perjured their testimony. But she wanted to use this case as a stepping stone in her career, regardless of the fact that she swore an oath to not allow her own "prejudices" to interfere with the administration of the law. Yes! Because she was interfering with the pieces of the game - her personal prejudice. key point! The Social Contract says Life is about the law that governs the situation. The context in question; Was it perjury, or not? Because if there is no evidence there can be no conviction; unless, of cause -there is corruption. This is the game of Law: you act according to the ...